Friday, March 26, 2010

Jim Chapman's Boner of the Week



NEW FEATURE!!!

Jim Chapman pulled a real boner in this week's opinion piece in his electronic newsletter 'Jim Chapman, The Voice of London.'

In 'Coulter Causes Consternation,' Jim says this of the very unfunny unsubtle hate-mongering Ann Coulter - "She is an American satirist from that rich iconoclastic tradition, although many people confuse her with a serious political commentator. Oh she is serious enough about the issues she cares about, but her method of addressing them owes more to Mark Twain than Thomas Jefferson."

And he says this with a straight face. Yep, I'm sure Samuel Clemens would be really flattered at such a comparison.

If you can swallow that one, you may want to size up more of Jim's boners at www.thevoiceoflondon.ca

Monday, March 22, 2010

Do These Smarty-Pants Make Me Seem Obtuse?



Unlike some websites, (Jim Chapman's latest mouthpiece ironically titled 'The Voice of London' is one prime example,) here at Sonny Drysdale Presents, the 'Comments' section is never closed.

Here is an email received by Beat Magazine (or www.beatmagazine.ca) for a column on the stage adaptation of 'Pride and Prejudice' which I did for the current March issue. You can read the original two posts down under 'The Annual Theatre Column.' If you haven't read it yet, I recommend that you do so before reading the rest of this here post.

Anyway - this is what one Stephanie O, has to say -

"Hi - I picked up 'The Beat' for the first time recently and was flipping through when I saw Sonny Drysdale's article on 'Pride and Prejudice.' The first time I read it I was shocked; I couldn't believe that someone would write an article that was so explicitly wrong in its facts (saying Jane Austen was a playwright, that 'Pride and Prejudice' was based on 'Bridget Jones'; that 'Emma' was based on 'Clueless' ...) When I searched Drysdale's blog online I saw that he had posted a very similary article, and that a few of the comments on it suggested that the piece may have actually meant to be tongue-in-cheek.

"I did not get the sense that it was some kind of joke when I was reading it (if that was in fact the case.) If Drysdale was joking, I'm not sure what his point was in doing so; my closest guess is that he was critiquing the fact that a plethora of Jane Austen remakes now exist and as a result people have forgotten that she was actually a renowned 18th c writer. But if there was a point in his suggestion that Austen is a contemporary playwright remaking 'Bridget Jones' and 'Clueless' into late 18th c set pieces it was lost on me and the other people I've shown the article to to get their opinions on it. It seems to me this article actually reproduces the very problem Drysdale might be poking fun at rather than critique it.

"As a PhD student of English literature, a former News Editor and Culture Editor for a small newspaper, and a writer and reader myself, I find this article somewhat troubling in that it doesn't accomplish much other than confusing readers more about Jane Austen's relationship to contemporary versions of her work.

"Otherwise, I think it's awesome that you've put together 'The Beat' and you've done great work in putting it together. Viva independent arts (print) publications :)"

... well, of course I can't comment on any of this. You don't explain a joke. It's just not done. It's unprofessional.

Instead, I will take the wise advice of my good friend Al who says that when dealing with such people, the best course of action is to simply say, "I'm sorry. You're absolutely right. It will never happen again." And then get out of the room as fast as you can before they see the smirk on your face.

Smug, Glib and Impertinent




As much as I enjoyed Stephanie O's letter to the editor about my 'Pride and Prejudice' column in 'The Beat,' (see the post above this one,) my personal all-time fave has to go to a letter published in 'Artscape' (an earlier incarnation of 'The Beat') in response to a column I wrote for their first issue back in February of 2006.

It was the time of year they announce the Academy Award nominations and I had complained about the fact that the best film I had seen the previous year was a thirty-second commercial for Kellogg's All-Bran Strawberry Bites. The Leo Burnett advertising agency titled it 'The Muse.' But for me it will always be 'Love Story Between Strawberry Girl and Research Guy."

I hope you remember it because it truly was beautiful. If not, you can always find it on the YouTube under 'All-Bran Strawberry Bites Ad.' or 'All Bran Strawberry Girl.'

But that's not really important here. Here is the passage I wrote which invoked the ire of one reader -

"I seldom get out to the motion-picture theatres these days. The reason? Hollywood just doesn't make any good romances anymore. Over the holidays, I had been thinking of seeing 'King Kong.' It's about a giant monkey who fights dinosaurs and has adventures and stuff and (get this) *falls in love* with a leggy blonde showgirl, the eternal male fantasy. But I'd already seen the original from 1976 starring Jeff Bridges and Jessica Lange so I didn't bother.

"The other much-hyped love story of 2005 was the cowboy movie 'Brokeback Mountain.' I passed on seeing this one for the same reason. I figured I'd already seen it before. Every western I've ever sat through ends the same way - the cowboy says good-bye to the school-marm and rides off into the sunset. There's never been a western made that wasn't really a love story about a man and his horse.

"The only other romance from last year that sounded half-interesting was 'Capote.' Apparently it's about this writer guy and his unrequited love for a jailed homicidal mass-murderer. Well, at least it's an original idea, I'll give 'em that much. But I really don't know anything about the movie so I can't comment on it."

... anyhoo, all of that prompted this printed response from a Ruth J. -

"Dear Mr. Drysdale, I am compelled to comment on your utter dismissal of 'Brokeback Mountain,' a movie which I found to be one of the finest love stories ever committed to film. I've seen the movie twice, to appreciate better its stunning Canadian landscapes, and most especially, its achingly, heart wrenching story of homosexual love. You, on the other hand, never having seen it at all, have the temerity, the abject audacity, to pan it outright. I have three words for you, Mr. Drysdale: they are "smug, glib, and impertinent."

Well, I guess she told me.

Saturday, March 20, 2010

The Annual Theatre Column



I LUUUVVVV live theatre. I simply adore it. That's why I always make an effort to get out and see some at least once a year. This time it's 'Pride and Prejudice' which currently is playing at the Grand Theatre until April 3rd.

Apparently it's an adaptation of the movie 'Bridget Jones Diary,' which starred Renee Zellwger in 2001. Renee plays this prim and proper English spinster babe who has to choose a rich husband because she has no dowry and that was the lot of poor single women back in the 1990s.

Will she choose Hugh Grant or Colin Firth? One is a rich cad. The other is the dark brooding Mr. Darcy - who she really likes but is always getting mad at because they keep having misunderstandings and he's a bit of a twit. Anyway, by the end, like all good romantic comedies, one of them proposes to her in the rain.

I haven't seen the sequel, 'Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason,' but I hope playwright Jane Austen puts some of its plot elements into her stage adaptation at the Grand. I've checked out some of the Pride and Prejudice-related literature and it could make for a really great night of theatre.

Some of the books take their cue from things that were only hinted at in the original Bridget Jones source material.

One such work is 'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies,' published last year by Quirk Books. Another, entitled 'Dawn of the Dreadfuls,' comes out this month from the same publisher. It is actually a 'prequel' and explains how Elizabeth Bennet (the Bridget Jones character) becomes a zombie hunter and explores her martial arts training and previous romantic misfortunes.

Two other 'P&P' books which also came out last year explore Mr. Darcy's mysterious and secretive nature. Amanda Grange's 'Mister Darcy, Vampyr' and Regina Jeffers' 'Vampire Darcy's Desire' deal with the Bridget Jones character slowly coming to the realization that her new husband is a vampire, one of the undead. Now, you might think that she would have noticed such a thing on her wedding night. That's why foreplay was invented. Just the same, both books contain all the bodice-ripper/heaving bosom elements that can only enhance any theatrical production.

So, I have high hopes for seeing 'Pride and Prejudice' at the Grand. I just hope Austen hasn't left out any of my favorite scenes from the movie. Mind you, I don't expect an exact remake in her 're-imagining.' But if she remains faithful to the *spirit* of Bridget Jones, then I will be happy and wish her well with her next project.

Rumour has it that she is adapting Alicia Silverstone's 1995 movie 'Clueless' for the stage. Its working title is 'Emma.'

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Bud Polhill - the Joe Fontana of Indecisive Political Aspirations



A slow news day at the London Free Press today.

Their website, www.lfpress.com contains this bulletin of BREAKING NEWS!!! Headline reads - Bud Polhill 'leaning toward' Ward Race. ... Still, he isn't ruling out the possiblilty that he may take a run at the Mayor's Chair in this fall's municipal election.

However, Bud will make his decision as to whether he is running for a city council 'ward' seat or the Mayor's big chair "within days."

"With a business to run and several grandchildren to chase, Polhill has indicated that the mayor's chair may not be a good fit for him," reports the London Free Press.

Well, that plus the fact that Bud doesn't have a hope in hell of being elected and defeating incumbant mayor Princess Anne-Marie.

And then there's the fact that the long-time councillor and Board of Controler obviously has big problems making a decision.

When the Free Press reported on December 30th of 2009 that Bud was considering a run for the Mayor's job, he told them that he hoped to make his decision after he had some polling done in January.

That was a minimum of six weeks ago. And this guy really thinks he has the decision-making capacity to be Mayor? Of even a small burg like Hicksville, Ohio?

Take your time with all that soul-searching, Bud. No one is expecting any real big *surprise* announcements "within days" - or within weeks for that matter.

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Whatever Happened To ...




A lot of you have written in lately asking of the whereabouts of Canadian 1976 Olympic medal-winning figure skater Toller Cranston.

According to the current March issue of 'Yoo-hoo! Canada,' the former figure-skating icon has spent the past twenty years in self-imposed exile, living quietly and discreetly in the artistic community of historic San Miguel de Allende, Mexico under the assumed name of 'Jimmy Osterberg.'

His days are spent painting on huge canvases and decorating his home - both in a bold but restrained form of minimalism. Nights are spent fronting a Stooges tribute-band named 'Forgotten Boy.' Due to the lack of ice-rinks in this cental Mexican village, the sixty-year-old legend of 'Dance on Ice,' no longer skates.

But whatever artistic medium he is working in, you can be sure that Mr. Cranston continues to look fabulous.

Saturday, March 06, 2010

I Like to Watch My Skating ... BUT ...



Figure skating. It's the most exciting thing on ice, right? Like curling only poetry.

Like the rest of Canada, this week I've really missed watching the Olympics. And most of all, I miss my skating. Particularly men's figure skating. Don't get me wrong. I watched all the hockey and cheered when Sidney Crosby sunk that last putt into the net. And I watched all the curling and tried to figure what the hell was going on when we won gold. My regional heart swelled with pride when those two local kids Tessa and Scott performed their magic on ice. And I had to sneak into the bathroom at work to cry when that Joannie girl from Quebec skated after her mom had died a few days earlier.

But the most bittersweet highlight for me was the first round of the men's figure skating and Johnny Weir had just done a pretty hot-shot - and apparently 'unorthodox' flounce around the ice. Now, I haven't watched a lot of skating in my lifetime, but enough to know that after their skate, someone always presents the lady skaters with a bouquet of roses to hold onto while they sit in the penalty box and wait for the judges to tally up and announce their score.

And when the camera cut to Johnny, he's sitting there with a tiara of roses atop his head. And the guy didn't even win! Didn't even come close. And looked like he couldn't care less. He accepted it as if he was used to it. Like it had happened before.

So I called up my friend Elvis who was at the games and he explained that Johnny didn't do any quads. Just triple axels and those squatting spinny things. Well, I was pretty pissed off to hear that. So what, I said. That Evan guy who won gold for the States didn't do any quads either!

And then Elvis explained that the judges don't like Johnny because he's too "flamboyant." And that the other men figure skaters make fun of him in the locker room by singing that Josie Cotton song, "Johnny are you Weir?"

I was pretty saddened to hear all this. I had naively thought that surely, as a civilization we have gotten past all that kind of narrow-minded thinking years ago after the industry bullied Toller Cranston into leaving skating and becoming a painter.

Well, if the skating community can't accept even one skater because of the colour of his skates, then I don't know if I want to even support it anymore.

You know, I had planned on going to see the Canadian Stars on Ice show at the downtown hockey arena on May 2nd. Everyone is going to be there. Tessa and Scotty. Kurt Browning. Joannie Rochette - that French girl whose mom died. Salle and Pelltier, the ones who got screwed in the last winter Olympics.

Yep. Everyone is going to be there. Well, almost everyone. Noticeably absent from that list is Johnny Weir. And is it because he's from the States and not Canadian? Well, I'm sure that's what the organizers would like you to believe. But the real reason is because he doesn't dress in the traditional puffy shirts, but in white silks and black leather. Because he has not only Paul Reuben's knack for make-up but the same twinkle in his eye. In short, he's just too 'flamboyant.'

Well, the boy can't help it. He was born that way. And if he chooses to hang out with Lady Gaga, that's his business. And if the Canadian figure skating community can't accept that, then, as a society we obviously still have a long way to go. Until the Canadian Stars on Ice Tour stops excluding Johnny Weir, I'll be staying home.

Will we never learn? My mother never really got over how the Americans did the same thing to Toller Cranston by not including him in the U.S. Stars on Ice Tours. This is like history repeating itself. That's what finally turned her off skating. I guess I'm turning into my mother.